Archive for May, 2010

Phony Israeli “Terror” Video Calls For Killing Americans

Posted in Mossad's 9/11 on May 26, 2010 by The 800 Pound Gorilla

Veterans Today

May 23, 2010

Mossad Front, Known For Phony Bin Laden Tapes

Is Tape Really Israel Saying, “Kill Americans, Not Us?”

Site Intelligence, an outlet that supplies terror videos it says it “finds on the internet,” videos nobody on earth, seems to notice, has released a new video from Anwar al Alaki, the Yemeni cleric earlier tied to FBI and Mossad paymasters.  The subject of the video became immediately suspicious when the only call made was for the murder of Americans and nothing condemning Israel for ethnic cleansing in Gaza nor any call for jihad against Israel.

The video, said to be produced in Saudi Arabia, has all the signs of another Israeli/Mossad “self serving” creation.  With dozens of similar Israeli produced phony terror videos filling Youtube, each one more transparent than the last, one would think the media that spreads this treasonous drivel would be called to account.

Every real, verified and genuine video from any Islamic group has had the same themes:

  • Demanding world condemnation of Israel
  • Demanding an end to US support for “Israeli aggression”
  • Calls to unite Islam against Israel.

The current video calls only for attacks on Americans, makes no mention of Israeli actions nor is Israel threatened or Jews targeted, quite the opposite.


With the only real distribution of these calls for terrorist acts against Americans from Israeli backed Site Intelligence and Rita Katz, Muslims unaware that the message is meant to deflect Israeli complicity in the Detroit “Crotch Bomber” episode and other “false flag” efforts are actually receiving orders to war against innocent Americans, messages originating from Israel, a country claiming to be an American ally.  These games, seen as harmless by reporters who knowing distrubute these phony videos around the world are openly calling for the murder of Americans.  This isn’t news, it’s terrorism.

With American policy pushing for a two state solution and demanding an end to ethnic cleansing in Israel, it is extremely unlikely that any jihadist group would call for attacks on an American government that has done more to face down Israeli intransigence more than any in recent history.  Israel’s efforts against the Obama administration have included:

  • Snubbing Vice President Biden during a visit
  • Calls for increased displacement of Palestinians in response to US demands for a building halt
  • Purchase of full page newspaper advertisements attacking President Obama, paid for by the Israeli government
  • Securing promises from over 400 members of congress to oppose President Obama’s policies in the Middle East
  • Securing statements from paid pundits, former military officers who have accepted gratuities from Israel, some worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, criticizing current American policies.


Creating and distributing calls for terrorist attacks on Americans is an act of war, as much as training and supplying Pakistani Taliban in the Times Square Bombing or shuffling the Detroit “Crotch Bomber” through Israeli run airports, a bomber whose Nigerian father has worked for Israel for years.

The Indo-Israeli support for groups attacking Pakistan, Islams only nuclear state, have involved training and arming the Pakistani Taliban, now little more than a front group for the Mossad and RAW.  With this group attacking Americans and involved in terrorism against the United States, they should accept they can no longer control their “terrorist surrogates.”

The old questions are always the best.  Who did this video serve?  The answer is simple.  The video takes blame off Israel for false flag terror attacks and is meant to focus Islamic anger against the United States for acts done by Israel, acts vigorously opposed by America.


War by deception, manipulating the American public through endless TV depictions of Muslims as ignorant and murderous has allowed Israel to act against America with no consequences, warring on their own allies, and taking billions in foreign aid in reward.

The following acts against America have an Israeli footprint:

  • The 1956 Suez War is now accepted as a precursor to the 1967 terror attack in Egypt by Israel.  Israel, with Britain and France, invaded Egypt.  America chastised Israel, Britain and France and ordered an immediate withdrawal, backed by the Soviet Union.  President Eisenhower found Israel totally at fault.
  • The 1963 murder of President Kennedy is now seen as an Israeli response to Kennedy’s demands that Israel close their Dimona nuclear weapons facility.  Informed circles now place total responsibility for the Kennedy killings, both John and Robert, on the Mossad.
  • The 1967 holocaust attack against the USS Liberty was an act of war on America by Israel.  Survivor accounts tell of strafing and firebombing lifeboats while a huge American flag flew openly.  The attack continued for hours.
  • The USS Liberty attack was meant to disguise the sneak attack on Egypt made by Israel in 1967.  American and Israeli children are taught Israel was attacked by Egypt except the entire Egyptian air force was destroyed on the ground and no Egyptian forces were mobilized.  Perhaps Site Intelligence has a video on this.
  • Anti-Semitic attacks across Europe have been shown to be a Mossad operation to get Jews to settle in Israel.  Every burned synagogue has the Mossad stamp on it.
  • The 1985 Achille Lauro hijacking and the murder of a Jewish American passenger are now suspected to have been a Mossad “false flag” operation
  • The mysterious Building 7 incident on 9/11 with Larry Silverstein claiming he ordered the building “pulled” in 20 minutes, an effort that would take weeks of engineering, tons of explosives and massive structural alterations puts the Mossad and their infamous “Dancing Israeli” film crew under extreme suspicion.
  • The Detroit “Crotch Bombing” of 2009 has tracked to a number of Israeli operatives, a “false flag” attack meant to enhance the world market for Israeli airport security technologies worth billions in profits
  • The long history of Israeli attacks on American security through numerous spy organizations and an equally long history of arrests and prosecutions of Israeli agents operating against America, with many of the most vital military secrets heading directly to American enemies including the Soviet Union


One of the most popular TV shows in America is NCIS.  Last season, “Jethro Gibbs,” a character on the show, “proved” Kennedy was killed by Oswald, a “lone gunman” by a feat of TV heroics, demonstrating his ability to use “Oswald’s weapon” to duplicate the shooting.  As a former sniper with a duplicate of Oswald’s Tasco scope on his desk, I find this amusing.  With a clear shot, I could have killed Kennedy with a pistol.  However, with Oswald’s real weapon, a Carcano rifle with a broken scope, I would have trouble hitting my own foot.  Shooting through a Texas Live Oak with a “glitchy” rifle with a broken scope is an act beyond the gods themselves.  This is twice the same producer has duplicated the same “heavy handed” theme, once earlier in a Quantum Leap episode.  Thus, a pattern emerges, in this and so many shows, conditioning the American public with deception.

Another TV show, Bones, ran the same premise, with former Army Ranger and sniper, the character “Booth” (concidence?) again, fictionally “proving” the original Kennedy hypothesis, one long ago proven to violate the laws of physics.   Even Gary Mack of the Discovery Channel, in “Target Car”recently made a half hearted attempt to sell the Oswald scenario.  Word is out that Charlie Brown is taking up the Carcano in the upcoming Easter Snoopy special.

Speaking of “the gods,” the TV series Angel had Goddess Jasmine directed Oswald, as a “lone gunman.”

The continual reselling of the “lone gunman myth” isn’t a coincidence.  Confirmed sources indicate that the FBI has received new information tying Israel directly to the Kennedy shooting.


Last night I watched 4 episodes of NCIS Los Angeles.  Three of them featured Islamic terrorists, painted in “comic book” quality strokes as crazed, cruel and insane.  The plot lines had only one purpose, to incite hatred and mislead viewers.  Early in WW2, the movie Sergeant York with Gary Cooper set the gold standard for propaganda.  Great writing, cinematography and acting produced a powerful film still popular today.  I love the film, even knowing it is wartime propaganda.  It is also art.

NCIS Los Angeles is childish, bigoted, brutal and racist.  An excellent cast, subjected to criminally manipulative storylines with no other purpose than to mislead and build hate only adds to the abuse.  It is made clear, not only are all Muslims terrorists, but they are sneering, sarcastic cowards hiding behind wealth, lawyers and continually using legal ploys, utterly imaginary of course, to stymie Americas counter-terrorist heroes.

When I look at the group that has suffered the highest casualty levels defending America, our Muslim translators, I get the same feeling I have touring American military cemetaries and viewing the Stars of David over the Jewish war dead.  When the Mojave Cross went up in 1934, Americans hated Jews more than even the Nazis in Germany, even though thousands died for America (and Germany) in the Great War.  Now, with Muslims dying around the world to defend the United States, thousands in fact, we spit on them with our pop culture propaganda focused to hide Israeli manipulation of American public opinion.

None of this is innocent, not the phony videos, not the TV shows, none of it.  Next time a video comes out of Tel Aviv calling on Muslims to murder Americans, perhaps we should pay attention.

By Gordon Duff Staff Writer/Senior Editor

Gordon Duff: Phony Israeli “Terror” Video Calls For Killing Americans


Times Square “Fizzler,” Israel’s Crotch Bomber Redux

Posted in Mossad's 9/11 on May 9, 2010 by The 800 Pound Gorilla

Times Square Bomber Faisal ShahzadVeterans Today

May 5, 2010

GOP and FOX NEWS Campaign Continues to Stamp Israeli Brand On Time Square Bomber More Airport Magic….

Watching the news on the arrest of the Time Square bomber, or as we will call him, “the Time Square Fizzler,”  and the flood of political attacks on the president and news reports condemning Pakistan and Islam make it all clear as a bell.  The ‘highly trained’ terrorist, supposedly schooled in explosives and ’secret agent stuff’ is another patsy.

Think “Mumbai” and the recent trial.  All our suspect could say, over and over, knowing he is doomed is that he was ’set up.’

With the Pakistan Taliban the biggest security risk for the only Islamic nuclear power, they became extremely attractive to India and Israel some time ago.  Noting that India has been given free rein to run intelligence operations on the Pakistani border, they and their good friends in Israel, have flooded the region with “helpers” busy recruiting, training and supporting attacks, primarily on Pakistan.

Some time ago, it was warned that these Indian and Israeli trained groups that the US had knowingly allowed, and admitted to, would be used against the United States.  Welcome to that world.

Last month, while in Pakistan with Jeff Gates and Raja Mujtaba, a number of supposed Germany “contractors” working for, well, we don’t know, were seen in Islamabad.

They were not hard to identify for some of us and Jeff confronted them about their real nationality.  Later, in private discussions with officials, whose identities we were asked to withhold, we confirmed that even Pakistan has a significant presence of Israeli “visitors” who can use their endless alternative identities and contracting relationships to move wherever they want.

Pakistan’s dependence on American fund to fight terrorism has left them helpless to oppose this openly.  With America under the thumb of Israel and Pakistan their biggest target, America’s mixed loyalties has led to a very disturbing situation.  Imagine having to invite a dangerous criminal into your home because your rich uncle loves him?

You now have an idea of the dynamic involved.

Watching the arrests and news stories is a wonder, seeing a “no fly list” person move in and out of America freely is amazing.

With a Pakistani visa in my passport, signed by their Defense Attache to Washington, I was held up last week from an Air France flight.  I need more Israeli friends if I want to get thru airports quicker.  Only after Homeland Security was notified, did I get on a plane.

This was good.  It was efficient.  I appreciated the security and everyone was highly effective and doing their jobs.

However, were I a “no fly list” terrorist, I could have gotten right thru.

However, were I the “crotch bomber” with no passport at all, I would have gotten right thru, right thru security in Israeli run airports.

As the news stories drone on, this will become clear.  The ‘trained terrorist’ will be tied to a huge network of idiots and dupes, all working in the region along the Afghani/Pakistan border, an area where India, and their Israeli friends, really do train terrorists who kill hundreds with real bombs in Pakistan.

Nobody will ever learn how our friend got thru airports or who helped him.  More and more videos from the Pakistan Taliban will come forward, all serving to bring a rain of ruin on them but damning Pakistan and raising sympathy for India and Israel.

Israeli controlled Fox News, yes, that is who runs it, will continue to drone on.

Everyone will be happy except for the worlds Muslims, who will continue to be damned as, not only terrorists but idiots as well.

We have a clever enemy who has no shortage of Muslim stooges to drag out of his bag of tricks.  Playing one group of Muslims against another is a profitable game.  We have just seen a move in it.

Watch and learn.

By Gordon Duff   |  STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Gordon Duff: Times Square “Fizzler,” Israel’s “Crotch Bomber Redux


Posted in Media Watch on May 6, 2010 by The 800 Pound Gorilla

American Free Press

May 5, 2010

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) says alleged racial slurs by Tea Party protesters against Congress members in March are “hate speech” and not protected by the First Amendment. According to ADL, Tea Party protesters “crossed the line” with racial slurs against black congressmen.

Such slurs, ADL head Abe Foxman contends, “are not constitutionally protected and require a strong legal response.”

Really? Such slurs are socially repugnant—and often unconstitutionally prosecuted under ADL-inspired state and local hate crime statutes. But racial, “homophobic,” and “anti-Semitic” slurs are protected by the First Amendment. Threat of imminent violence against a congressman is illegal.

But tolerance of slurs as well as profane, obscene and blasphemous speech is a necessary side effect of America’s unique efforts to protect speech as much as possible. The government can’t prosecute people for hurting others’ feelings. Several months ago, Democratic leadership responded to North Carolina Republican Rep. Joe Wilson’s public accusation that President Obama was a “liar” by severely limiting congressional members’ freedom to criticize the president. If Republican and Democrat leadership take Foxman’s advice and go a step further, they will criminalize perhaps offensive, yet constitutionally protected, speech by Tea Party participants as well.

How would this draconian speech ban be enforced? By ADL’s readymade federal “hate crimes” law. The hate crimes law criminalizes not just violent crimes involving hatred but also “general bias crimes against persons or property.” ADL considers public slurs against protected groups a hate crime in the dozens of hate crime bureaucracies it has created worldwide. If Congress follows its recommendations, the Justice Department could initiate test indictments for statements that are racially or sexually derisive.

In appeals courts, “liberal” judges would likely uphold “the federal interest,” outlawing the bias and words that ostensibly lead to “crimes of prejudice.” The hate law would thus morph into a full-blown speech crimes law. With such precedent the government could also criminalize much “seditious,” “violence-inciting” and “terrorist” hate speech at Tea Party protests and online.

The hate law is also meant to “prevent” hate crimes. This suggests a federal mandate to discourage the biased thoughts and words the government views as causing hate crimes. The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act is also meant to prosecute hate crimes “and for other purposes”—purposes known only to its framer, the ADL.

The ADL just produced a 20-page report, “Violent Voices: Anti-Government Extremism Takes on New Intensity.” The report gives examples of “hate speech” now proliferating on the Internet and suggests these words will lead to violence.

Freedom of speech and conscience should mean that if Americans believe a member of Congress truly betrayed our nation and Constitution they have the right to say so. In the early 1950s, Americans demanded the execution of atomic spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Today, they have the same right to the opinion that, following due process, execution of a treasonous public official is justified. A government guilty of treason also deserves a violent end. This last, desperate option is upheld by the Constitution, and millions now believe revolution may be publicly advocated lawfully.

Contrary to ADL’s depiction of such verbal sentiment as hateful, this view springs primarily from patriotic conviction, not “hate.” Although countless Americans may now hold this opinion, it does not mean they intend to imminently execute traitors. It is not in the same category as sending an email to one’s congressman, threatening to kill him at his next town hall meeting.

Yet if the ADL is successful in making slurs indictable, soon all who “threaten” government officials through “uncivil” speech could be viewed as hate criminals. Several years ago, a Canadian angrily emailed his member of Parliament for permitting excessive immigration. The MP filed hate crime charges under the ADL’s Canadian hate laws, and the charges were upheld. Since the number of Americans now uttering “seditious” sentiments is so large, the ADL is clearly beginning to condition the public to believe that sweeping legislative action and prosecution may be necessary to preserve order.

The vulnerability of Tea Party members to such prosecution is heightened by the efforts of the organized Jewish left to infiltrate Tea Party meetings with “agents provocateurs.” These activists want to bring the Tea Party into disrepute through manufactured abuses.

What will keep these Jewish provocateurs, shouting slurs, from themselves being indicted under possible hate law enforcement? Simple. Attorney General Eric Holder made perfectly clear last spring in the hate bill’s Senate Judiciary hearing that Jews are protected from indictment under the hate law. Meanwhile, indicted whites, Christians and conservatives face at least triple penalties. If the Tea Party and “far-right” activists and survivalist groups can retain self-control for the next six months, both the  Senate and House can be restructured at midterms in November.

If the present populist revolt fails, America will probably plunge into the same fatalistic hopelessness. Is there hope? Yes, if we don’t destroy ourselves.

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian conservative watchdog organization.

An invention called ‘the Jewish people’

Posted in Etc. on May 6, 2010 by The 800 Pound Gorilla

February 28, 2008

Israel’s Declaration of Independence states that the Jewish people arose in the Land of Israel and was exiled from its homeland. Every Israeli schoolchild is taught that this happened during the period of Roman rule, in 70 CE. The nation remained loyal to its land, to which it began to return after two millennia of exile. Wrong, says the historian Shlomo Zand, in one of the most fascinating and challenging books published here in a long time. There never was a Jewish people, only a Jewish religion, and the exile also never happened – hence there was no return. Zand rejects most of the stories of national-identity formation in the Bible, including the exodus from Egypt and, most satisfactorily, the horrors of the conquest under Joshua. It’s all fiction and myth that served as an excuse for the establishment of the State of Israel, he asserts.

According to Zand, the Romans did not generally exile whole nations, and most of the Jews were permitted to remain in the country. The number of those exiled was at most tens of thousands. When the country was conquered by the Arabs, many of the Jews converted to Islam and were assimilated among the conquerors. It follows that the progenitors of the Palestinian Arabs were Jews. Zand did not invent this thesis; 30 years before the Declaration of Independence, it was espoused by David Ben-Gurion, Yitzhak Ben-Zvi and others.

If the majority of the Jews were not exiled, how is it that so many of them reached almost every country on earth? Zand says they emigrated of their own volition or, if they were among those exiled to Babylon, remained there because they chose to. Contrary to conventional belief, the Jewish religion tried to induce members of other faiths to become Jews, which explains how there came to be millions of Jews in the world. As the Book of Esther, for example, notes, “And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.” Zand quotes from many existing studies, some of which were written in Israel but shunted out of the central discourse. He also describes at length the Jewish kingdom of Himyar in the southern Arabian Peninsula and the Jewish Berbers in North Africa. The community of Jews in Spain sprang
from Arabs who became Jews and arrived with the forces that captured Spain
from the Christians, and from European-born individuals who had also become Jews.

The first Jews of Ashkenaz (Germany) did not come from the Land of Israel and did not reach Eastern Europe from Germany, but became Jews in the Khazar Kingdom in the Caucasus. Zand explains the origins of Yiddish culture: it was not a Jewish import from Germany, but the result of the connection between the offspring of the Kuzari and Germans who traveled to the East, some of them as merchants.

We find, then, that the members of a variety of peoples and races, blond and black, brown and yellow, became Jews in large numbers. According to Zand, the Zionist need to devise for them a shared ethnicity and historical continuity produced a long series of inventions and fictions, along with an invocation of racist theses. Some were concocted in the minds of those who conceived the Zionist movement, while others were offered as the findings of genetic studies conducted in Israel.

Prof. Zand teaches at Tel Aviv University. His book, “When and How Was the Jewish People Invented?” (published by Resling in Hebrew), is intended to promote the idea that Israel should be a “state of all its citizens” –  Jews, Arabs and others – in contrast to its declared identity as a “Jewish and democratic” state. Personal stories, a prolonged theoretical discussion and abundant sarcastic quips do not help the book, but its historical chapters are well-written and cite numerous facts and insights that many Israelis will be astonished to read for the first time.

The mosquito from Kiryat Yam

On March 27, 1948, a meeting was held in Hiafa concerning the fate of the Bedouin of Arab al-Ghawarina in the Haifa area. “They must be removed from there, so that they, too, will not add to our troubles,” Yosef Weitz, of the Keren Kayemeth (Jewish National Fund), wrote in his personal diary. Two months later, Weitz reported to the organization’s director, “Our Haifa Bay has been evacuated completely and there is hardly a remnant of those who encroached our border.” They were probably expelled to Jordan; some were allowed to remain in the village of Jisr al-Zarqa. The fate of the Arab al-Ghawarina Bedouin has recently made the headlines thanks to Shmuel Sisso, mayor of the Haifa suburb of Kiryat Yam. He has filed a complaint with the police against Google. The reason is the addition that one of the site’s surfers, a resident of Nablus, attached to the center of Kiryat Yam in the world satellite photo, stating that the city is built on the ruins of a village that was destroyed in 1948, Arab al-Ghawarina.
Sisso’s complaint says that this is slanderous.

The facts are as follows: The lands of the Zevulun Valley were purchased in the 1920s by the JNF and by various construction companies, among them one called Gav Yam. The Zionist Archives have the plan for the establishment of Kiryat Yam, dated 1938, and a letter from 1945 states that there were already 100 homes there. Government maps from the British Mandate period identify the territory on which Kiryat Yam was built by two names: Zevulun Valley and Ghawarina. Thus it appears that this was not a settlement but an area in which Bedouin resided.

The Web site of the Israeli organization Zochrot (Remembering) states that there were 720 people at the site in 1948 and that the area was divided among three kibbutzim: Ein Hamifratz, Kfar Masaryk and Ein Hayam, today Ein Carmel.

This story has been making the rounds on the Internet and drawing responses, which can be summed up as follows: “If Sisso is suing Google because they stated that he is living on a destroyed Arab village, the implication is that he thinks this is something bad.” Sisso, a lawyer of 57 who is identified with Likud and was formerly Israeli consul general in New York, says, “I don’t think there is anything bad about it, but other people might think it is bad, especially people abroad, and that is liable to hurt Kiryat Yam, because people will not want to invest here. Since we are not sitting on a Palestinian village, why should we have to suffer for no reason?”

Moroccan-born, Sisso arrived in Israel in 1955. “I wandered around the whole region and I saw no trace of anyone’s having been here before us and supposedly expelled.” He asked an American law professor how, if at all, Google could be sued for slander or for damages. This, he says, is the contribution of Kiryat Yam to the struggle against the right of return (of the Palestinian refugees).

It could turn out to be the most riveting trial since Ariel Sharon sued Time magazine, but mayor Sisso has no illusions: “Me against Google is like a mosquito against an elephant,” he said this week.
Who America belongs to

Two professors, Gabi Shefer and Avi Ben-Zvi, were guests this week on Yitzhak Noy’s “International Hour” current events program on Israel Radio. The anchor, sounding slightly concerned, asked whether the achievements of Barack Obama show that the United States no longer belongs to the white man. Prof. Shefer confirmed this: Obama is an immigrant, he said. Prof. Ben-Zvi asked to add a remark: Gabi Shefer is right, he said. They are both wrong. If Obama were an immigrant, he would not be eligible to be elected president. He was born in Honolulu, some two years after Hawaii became the 50th state of the union.

How Ashkenazi Jewish are you?

Carl Zimmer pointed me to a new paper, A genome-wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of European Americans. The title is so informative that pasting the abstract is almost unnecessary, but here is the conclusion which gets to the point:

In conclusion, we show that, at least in the context of the studied sample, it is possible to predict full Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, although it should be noted that the exact dividing line between a Jewish and non-Jewish cluster will vary across sample sets which in practice would reduce the accuracy of the prediction. While the full historical demographic explanations for this distinction remain to be resolved, it is clear that the genomes of individuals with full Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry carry an unambiguous signature of their Jewish heritage, and this seems more likely to be due to their specific Middle Eastern ancestry than to inbreeding.

There have been other papers which show that Ashkenazi Jews form a separate cluster from gentile whites in the United States. This is important again in the context of biomedical studies attempting to ascertain the genetic roots of particular diseases; population substructure (e.g., Jew vs. non-Jew) may result in confounded associations. Also, one of the authors of the paper is David Goldstein, author of the fascinating Jacob’s Legacy.
In any case, on to the PC charts where the real action is. Do note that I’ve resized and added explanatory labels here & there for clarity.

As you can see, there is almost perfect separation between the Jewish and non-Jewish clusters here. PC 1 = first principle component of variation, and PC 2 second principle component of variation. These are the two largest independent dimensions of genetic variance extractable out of the data set. The authors note that there is almost perfect separation along PC 1, and, they note that most of the gentile whites who are closest to the Jews on this PC are of Italian or Eastern Mediterranean origin. This is important later.

As you can see here, the interesting point is that Jewish ancestral quanta is roughly predictive of genetic position. This shouldn’t be that surprising once we know that Jews and non-Jews separate so cleanly (e.g., someone who is biracial would be located between their two parent racial clusters on any plot), but it is striking nonetheless in reaffirming the genetic reality of Jewishness. The United States has an easy genealogical history for Jews, as the ancestors of all self-identified American Jews today arrived on the order of 4-6 generations ago. These individuals were likely Jewish relatively far back in their lineages, and admixture is easy to recall because it is of recent vintage.

Finally, let’s put Ashkenazi Jews in the worldwide context.
I labeled a few populations for clarity. Orcadians are individuals from the Orkney Islands, just off the northern coast of Scotland. As you can see, American whites occupy an expansive region, in large part due to their diverse origins and admixtures. The Druze have been genetically isolated for over 5 centuries, so it is not particularly surprising they form a distinct cluster. It is likely a function of drift due to bottlenecking, just like Iceland. The separation between the Ashkenazi and the Palestinians might be of interest to some because of political reasons.
As the authors note, the Ashkenazi are almost certainly a compound population. There are full-Jews who “look gentile” and full-Jews who could pass easily in the Middle East as a native. Most Ashkenazi Jews exhibit a mix of features. The genetic likelihood that the Ashkenazi have varied origins should no surprise. The paper notes that Askhenazi heterozygosity is actually somewhat greater than American whites, implying that the source of their distinctiveness has to do with genetic origin, not genetic history (i.e., population bottlenecks). Another population which I suspect resembles the population history of the Ashkenazi are Uyghurs, who fall between Europeans and Han Chinese in their ancestry. But the hybridization even occurred in the past, so the Uyghurs today can be thought of as a separate population with its own suite of genetic combinations, as opposed to a hybrid of two “pure” groups. Similarly, Ashkenazi Jews no doubt emerged from hybridization evens between Middle Eastern and European females, but over the generations they have been relatively endogamous (most gene flow has been out of the community into gentile Europeans through conversion) and so are a genetically coherent population in their own right.
Note that the authors had only a few non-Ashkenazi Jews in their sample, so the assertions above only apply to the Ashkenazi (95-99% of America’s Jewish population, but only ~50% of Israel’s).
Update: Dienekes emphasizes that the hypothesis that the admixture element which makes Ashkenazi Jews distinctive from other Europeans is Middle Eastern is somewhat speculative. I’m less skeptical than him seeing as how some Y lineages are Middle Eastern, but he offers this interesting point:

With that said, I do suspect that the distinctiveness of the Ashkenazi Jews is in part due to the possession of a Middle Eastern component of unspecified strength. I base this hypothesis on the results reported to me about the EURO-DNA-CALC test. This test distinguishes between NW, SE Europeans and Ashkenazi Jews; a few Arab individuals who have communicated their results to me have reported fairly high AJ components, indicating that part of what distinguishes an AJ from Europeans is related to the Middle Eastern Semitic background of that group.

Who is Mohammad Dahlan? (2006)

Posted in Israel on May 4, 2010 by The 800 Pound Gorilla

Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, 20 December 2006

Mohammed Dahlan, PLC member of Fatah, speaks during a press conference after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas delivered a speech to the nation from his headquarters in the West Bank city of Ramallah December 16, 2006. (MaanImages/Fadi Arouri)

Some have called Mohammad Dahlan the Palestinian Ahmad Chalabi, because he reportedly negotiated with the US and Israel about taking control of Gaza after the August 2005 disengagement plan. In April 2002 testifying before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer said he had offered control of the Gaza Strip to Dahlan. In exchange, Dahlan, who had control of the most significant military force on the Gaza Strip, would be obligated to ensure complete quiet along the border.[1] He is believed to have drawn up an early agreement at a January 1994 meeting in Rome with senior Israeli military and Shin Bet officials to contain Hamas, and was actively involved in subsequent negotiations with the Israelis.[2]

Today, Dahlan has become the face of one side of Fatah as violence increased between Hamas and Fatah. In the past week he has made his way back into Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas’ inner circle. Last week, Hamas accused Dahlan of planning an attempted assassination of prime minister Ismail Haniya of the Hamas movement. Haniya was returning from a Middle East tour which raised badly needed funds for Palestinians under occupation, and obtained a promise from the Syrian government to release all Palestinians in its jails, when chaos ensued. The situation at the Egypt-Gaza border crossing was tense as it had not been open long enough for the thousands of people waiting on both sides to pass. The Israelis closed the border when Haniya first tried to enter as he was bringing in funds, prohibited under the US-led economic and political blockade imposed after Hamas won the parliamentary elections in January.

Dahlan began a tour of Palestinian towns this week to rally support for Fatah, but it was not a spectacular success. On December 17, while Dahlan toured Jenin refugee camp, gunmen fired in the air over his convoy, shouting at him until he made a hasty exit. He blamed Hamas for sparking the killing of three children in Gaza City and said that Hamas “does not have any political program, leaving the Palestinian people in the predicament they have lived through since this government took responsibility.”

Meanwhile the United States has accelerated its arms transfers to Fatah, via Israel. Dahlan is now in command of the armed campaign against Hamas from presidential headquarters in Ramallah.

Dahlan was a founding member of Shabiba, the youth association of Fatah. In 1994, Dahlan headed the notorious Preventive Security Forces in Gaza. He is known to have good connections with the Egyptian leadership and the US administration, through his connections with the CIA. Dahlan built up a force of at least 20,000 men and received help from CIA officials to train them. Jibril Rajoub, another Fatah strongman, is Dahlan’s sworn rival. Dahlan and Rajoub were both jailed by Israel during the first Intifada. Under Oslo they became heads of the Preventive Security Services in Gaza and the West Bank respectively. At that time they were both viewed as pragmatists, representative of a new generation of Palestinians who could live with Israel.

Both Dahlan and Rajoub were implicated in financial scandals and human rights violations. Dahlan worked together with Israeli authorities to crack down on opposition groups, most notably Hamas, arresting thousands of members. Dahlan was in command when his Preventive Security Forces arbitrary arrest hundreds of Palestinians. The first violent clashes between his forces and demonstrators erupted on November 18, 1994.The toll of at least fifteen dead and hundreds wounded raised troubling questions about his troops.

Throughout the years, Dahlan’s forces were involved in acts of violence and intimidation against critics, journalists and members of opposition groups, primarily from Hamas, imprisoning them without formal charges for weeks or months at a time. A number of prisoners died under suspicious circumstances during or after interrogation by Dahlan’s forces.[3]

In 1996, Dahlan’s troops were involved in mass arbitrary arrests of opponents of Fatah. In the aftermath of the February-March suicide bombings in Israel, an estimated 2,000 people were rounded up, often arbitrarily. Most of those detained were never charged with a criminal offense or put on trial. Torture and ill-treatment by his forces occurred regularly during interrogation and led to a number of deaths.

Dahlan frequently meets high profile members of the Israeli military establishment, including former Defense Minister and former Chief of Staff Shaul Mofaz. (AP File photo)

In 2000, Dahlan participated in the Camp David negotiations and Israeli leaders saw him as someone they could do business with. As head of one of the main Palestinian security organisations, Mr Dahlan also negotiated with Israeli officials to try to arrange a ceasefire several times after the most recent Intifada erupted in September 2000. With the beginning of the second intifada, Dahlan claimed that he was unable to stop the activities of such militant groups as Hamas.

In 2001 he angered the late Palestinian president Yasir Arafat by expressing his dissatisfaction over the lack of a coherent policy during the current uprising. Dahlan resigned in June 2002 over disagreements with Arafat to reform the Palestinian Authority. He attempted to gather support for an electoral challenge to Arafat, but stopped, when the Bush administration demanded a change in PA leadership in July of the same year. Before his resignation from the PA in June 2002, Dahlan was a frequent member on negotiating teams for security issues.

In March and April 2002, Dahlan was one of the “Gang of Five” who lead the PA during the siege of Arafat’s headquarters in Ramallah. Although Arafat retained power and named Dahlan as National Security Advisor in July 2002, Dahlan resigned three months later complaining of lack of authority and organization in the Palestinian Authority. Against Arafat’s wishes, Mahmoud Abbas, then serving as prime minister, appointed Dahlan as Interior Minister, but when Abbas resigned, Dahlan was left outside the newly formed cabinet.

After being left out of the new Palestinian Authority cabinet, Dahlan began gathering support from low-level Fatah officials and former Preventive Security Service officers in response to a perceived lack of democratic reforms among Fatah leaders.

In 2004, Dahlan was the driving force behind week-long unrests in Gaza following the appointment of Yasser Arafat’s nephew Mousa Arafat, widely accused of corruption, as head of Gaza police forces. Some thought this appointmnt was a deliberate step to weaken Dahlan’s position before the disengagement process in the Gaza Strip and sparked massive protests.

Dahlan returned to the political forefront and security arena this week. He appeared in a meeting with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in Jericho, and meetings with the European Union’s Javier Solana and the German Foreign Affairs Minister. It seems that for whatever reason, world leaders think Dahlan is the right person for them to deal with.

Arjan El Fassed is a cofounder of The Electronic Intifada


[1] Ha’aretz, Gideon Alon (30 Apr 2002)
[2] Middle East International, 520.
[3] Annual reports of Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens’ Rights (PICCR); various reports from Addameer, PCHR and LAW; Palestinian Self-Rule Areas: Human Rights under the Palestinian Authority, Human Rights Watch (September 1997); Annual reports Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (1994, 1995, 1996).

Related Links

  • BY TOPIC: People


    The Neoconservative (i.e., Jewish Zionist) think-tanks that led the US to war on Iraq

    Posted in Media Watch on May 4, 2010 by Tanner Brown

    Jewish Zionist control of the US political system — all branches of government and across the political spectrum — has become so blatant, that even a cursory reading of mainstream news headlines will inform the savvy reader of the dismal fact.

    This was particularly the case in the years following Israel’s 9/11 coup and the run-up to the Zionist-orchestrated US-led invasion of Iraq, as Jewish Zionist operatives — calling themselves, oxymoronically, “New Conservatives,” or “Neoconservatives” — installed and ran Idiot President George W. Bush right in front of our eyes.

    This excellent Guardian article by Brian Whitaker, from way back in 2002, was one of the seminal mainstream news pieces that confirmed the 800lb Gorilla’s long-held suspicion that the Jews do, in fact, control America — lock, stock and barrel.

    In the article, Whitaker explains how a small clique of Zionists employed a “cleverly-constructed network” of Neoconservative “think-tanks” to manipulate the US — to the latter’s eternal detriment and shame — into waging war on Israel’s enemies.


    The Neoconservative think-tanks that led the US to war on Iraq

    The Guardian (UK); August 19, 2002

    By Brian Whitaker

    A little-known fact about Richard Perle, the leading advocate of hard-line policies at the Pentagon, is that he once wrote a political thriller. The book, appropriately called Hard Line, is set in the days of the cold war with the Soviet Union. Its hero is a male senior official at the Pentagon, working late into the night and battling almost single-handedly to rescue the US from liberal wimps at the state department who want to sign away America’s nuclear deterrent in a disarmament deal with the Russians.

    Ten years on Mr Perle finds himself cast in the real-life role of his fictional hero — except that the Russians are no longer a threat, so he has to make do with the Iraqis, the Saudis and terrorism in general.

    In real life too, Mr Perle is not fighting his battle single-handed. Around him there is a cozy and cleverly-constructed network of Middle East “experts” who share his neoconservative outlook and who pop up as talking heads on US television, in newspapers, books, testimonies to congressional committees, and at lunchtime gatherings in Washington.

    The network centers on research institutes — think-tanks that attempt to influence government policy and are funded by tax-deductible gifts from unidentified donors.

    When he is not too busy at the Pentagon, or too busy running Hollinger Digital — part of the group that publishes the Daily Telegraph in Britain — or at board meetings of the Jerusalem Post, Mr Perle is “resident fellow” at one of the think-tanks — the American Enterprise Institute (AEI).

    Mr Perle’s close friend and political ally at AEI is David Wurmser, head of its Middle East studies department. Mr Perle helpfully wrote the introduction to Mr Wurmser’s book, ‘Tyranny’s Ally: America’s Failure to Defeat Saddam Hussein.’

    Mr Wurmser’s wife, Meyrav, is co-founder, along with Colonel Yigal Carmon, formerly of Israeli military intelligence — of the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri), which specializes in translating and distributing articles that show Arabs in a bad light.

    She also holds strong views on leftwing Israeli intellectuals, whom she regards as a threat to Israel.

    [Read Whitaker’s excellent expose of Ms. Wurmser’s ridiculous Middle East Research Institute, cleverly entitled ‘Selective Memri, HERE]

    Ms Wurmser currently runs the Middle East section at another think-tank — the Hudson Institute, where Mr Perle recently joined the board of trustees. In addition, Ms Wurmser belongs to an organization called the Middle East Forum.

    Michael Rubin, a specialist on Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan, who recently arrived from yet another think-tank, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, assists Mr Perle and Mr Wurmser at AEI. Mr Rubin also belongs to the Middle East Forum.

    Another Middle East scholar at AEI is Laurie Mylroie, author of ‘Saddam Hussein’s Unfinished War against America,’ which expounds a rather daft theory that Iraq was behind the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing.

    When the book was published by the AEI, Mr Perle hailed it as “splendid and wholly convincing.”

    An earlier book on Iraq, Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf which Ms Mylroie co-authored with Judith Miller, a New York Times journalist, became the New York Times’ No 1 bestseller.

    Ms Mylroie and Ms Miller both have connections with the Middle East Forum. Mr Perle, Mr Rubin, Ms Wurmser, Ms Mylroie and Ms Miller are all clients of Eleana Benador, a Peruvian-born linguist who acts as a sort of theatrical agent for experts on the Middle East and terrorism, organizing their TV appearances and speaking engagements.

    Of the 28 clients on Ms Benador’s books, at least nine are connected with the AEI, the Washington Institute and the Middle East Forum.

    Although these three privately-funded organizations promote views from only one end of the political spectrum, the amount of exposure that they get with their books, articles and TV appearances is extraordinary.

    The Washington Institute, for example, takes the credit for placing up to 90 articles written by its members — mainly “op-ed” pieces — in newspapers during the last year.

    Fourteen of those appeared in the Los Angeles Times, nine in New Republic, eight in the Wall Street Journal, eight in the Jerusalem Post, seven in the National Review Online, six in the Daily Telegraph, six in the Washington Post, four in the New York Times and four in the Baltimore Sun. Of the total, 50 were written by Michael Rubin.

    Anyone who has tried offering op-ed articles to a major newspaper will appreciate the scale of this achievement.

    The media attention bestowed on these think-tanks is not for want of other experts in the field. American universities have about 1,400 full-time faculty members specializing in the Middle East.

    Of those, an estimated 400-500 are experts on some aspect of contemporary politics in the region, but their views are rarely sought or heard, either by the media or government.

    “I see a parade of people from these institutes coming through as talking heads [on cable TV]. I very seldom see a professor from a university on those shows,” says Juan Cole, professor of history at Michigan University, who is a critic of the private institutes.

    “Academics [at universities] are involved in analyzing what’s going on but they’re not advocates, so they don’t have the same impetus,” he said. “The expertise on the Middle East that exists in the universities is not being utilized, even for basic information.”

    Of course, very few academics have agents like Eleana Benador to promote their work and very few are based in Washington — which can make arranging TV appearances, or rubbing shoulders with state department officials a bit difficult.

    Those who work for US thinktanks are often given university-style titles such as “senior fellow”, or “adjunct scholar”, but their research is very different from that of universities — it is entirely directed towards shaping government policy.

    What nobody outside the thinktanks knows, however, is who pays for this policy-shaping research.

    Under US law, large donations given to non-profit, “non-partisan” organisations such as thinktanks must be itemised in their annual “form 990” returns to the tax authorities. But the identity of donors does not need to be made public.

    The AEI, which deals with many other issues besides the Middle East, had assets of $35.8m (£23.2m) and an income of $24.5m in 2000, according to its most recent tax return.

    It received seven donations of $1m or above in cash or shares, the highest being $3.35m.

    The Washington Institute, which deals only with Middle East policy, had assets of $11.2m and an income of $4.1m in 2000. The institute says its donors are identifiable because they are also its trustees, but the list of trustees contains 239 names which makes it impossible to distinguish large benefactors from small ones.

    The smaller Middle East Forum had an income of less than $1.5m in 2000, with the largest single donation amounting to $355,000.

    In terms of their ability to influence policy, thinktanks have several advantages over universities. To begin with they can hire staff without committee procedures, which allows them to build up teams of researchers that share a similar political orientation.

    They can also publish books themselves without going through the academic refereeing processes required by university publishers. And they usually site themselves in Washington, close to government and the media.

    Apart from influencing policy on the Middle East, the Washington Institute and the Middle East Forum recently launched a campaign to discredit university departments that specialise in the region.

    After September 11, when various government agencies realised there was a shortage of Americans who could speak Arabic, there were moves to beef up the relevant university departments.

    But Martin Kramer, of the Washington Institute, Middle East Forum and former director of the Moshe Dayan Centre at Tel Aviv University, had other ideas.

    He produced a vitriolic book, ‘Ivory Towers on Sand,’ which criticised Middle East departments of universities in the US.

    His book was published by the Washington Institute and warmly reviewed in the Weekly Standard, whose editor, William Kristol, was a member of the Middle East Forum along with Mr Kramer.

    “Kramer has performed a crucial service by exposing intellectual rot in a scholarly field of capital importance to national wellbeing,” the review said.

    The Washington Institute is considered the most influential of the Middle East thinktanks, and the one that the state department takes most seriously. Its director is the former US diplomat, Dennis Ross.

    Besides publishing books and placing newspaper articles, the institute has a number of other activities that for legal purposes do not constitute lobbying, since this would change its tax status.

    It holds lunches and seminars, typically about three times a week, where ideas are exchanged and political networking takes place. It has also given testimony to congressional committees nine times in the last five years.

    Every four years, it convenes a “bipartisan blue-ribbon commission” known as the Presidential study group, which presents a blueprint for Middle East policy to the newly-elected president.

    The institute makes no secret of its extensive links with Israel, which currently include the presence of two scholars from the Israeli armed forces.

    Israel is an ally and the connection is so well known that officials and politicians take it into account when dealing with the institute. But it would surely be a different matter if the ally concerned were a country such as Egypt, Pakistan or Saudi Arabia.

    Apart from occasional lapses, such as the publication of Mr Kramer’s book, the Washington Institute typically represents the considered, sober voice of American-Israeli conservatism.

    The Middle East Forum is its strident voice — two different tones, but mostly the same people.

    Three prominent figures from the Washington InstituteRobert Satloff (director of policy), Patrick Clawson (director of research) and Mr Rubin (prolific writer, currently at AEI) — also belong to the forum.

    Daniel Pipes, the bearded $100,000-a-year head of the forum is listed as an “associate” at the institute, while Mr Kramer, editor of the forum’s journal, is a “visiting fellow”.

    Mr Pipes became the bete noire of US Muslim organisations after writing an article for the National Review in 1990 that referred to “massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and not exactly maintaining Germanic standards of hygiene”.

    Since he usually complains vigorously when the words are quoted outside their original context, readers are invited to view the full article at He is also noted for his combative performances on the Fox News channel, where he has an interesting business relationship. Search for his name on the Fox News website and, along with transcripts of his TV interviews, an advert appears saying “Daniel Pipes is available thru Barber & Associates, America’s leading resource for business, international and technology speakers since 1977”.

    The Middle East Forum issues two regular publications, the Middle East Quarterly and the Middle East Intelligence Bulletin, the latter published jointly with the United States Committee for a Free Lebanon.

    The Middle East Quarterly describes itself as “a bold, insightful, and controversial publication”.

    Among the insights in its latest issue is an article on weapons of mass destruction that says Syria “has more destructive capabilities” than Iraq, or Iran.

    The Middle East Intelligence Bulletin, which is sent out by email free of charge — but can never-the-less afford to pay its contributors — specialises in covering the seamy side of Lebanese and Syrian politics. The ever-active Mr Rubin is on its editorial board.

    The Middle East Forum also targets universities through its campus speakers Bureau — that in adopting the line of Mr Kramer’s book, seeks to correct “inaccurate Middle Eastern curricula in American education”, by addressing “biases” and “basic errors” and providing “better information” than students can get from the many “irresponsible” professors that it believes lurk in US universities.

    At a time when much of the world is confused by what it sees as an increasingly bizarre set of policies on the Middle East coming from Washington, to understand the neat little network outlined above may make such policies a little more explicable.

    Of course these people and organisations are not the only ones trying to influence US policy on the Middle East. There are others who try to influence it too — in different directions.

    However, this particular network is operating in a political climate that is currently especially receptive to its ideas.

    It is also well funded by its anonymous benefactors and is well organised. Ideas sown by one element are watered and nurtured by the others.

    Whatever outsiders may think about this, worldly-wise Americans see no cause for disquiet. It’s just a coterie of like-minded chums going about their normal business, and an everyday story of political life in Washington.

    The above article can be found at:

    For more on the Jewish Neoconservatives and their extensive influence on US policymaking, watch the excellent — and surprisingly candid — BBC documentary ‘The War Party’ HERE


    Posted in Media Watch, Mossad's 9/11 with tags , , on May 3, 2010 by The 800 Pound Gorilla

    Veterans Today

    May 2, 2010

    ISRAELIS BLAME TALIBAN GROUP, ONE THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH FOR YEARSWho would have believed it?  Only days after a warning of an Israeli “false flag” bombing against the US “in the works” a massive car bomb is discovered in Time Square!  Better yet, though no intelligence organization in the world could discover anyone claiming responsibility for this embarrassing failure, SITE Intelligence, a group rumored as the “voice of the Mossad” has placed the blame on the Pakistani Taliban.

    This is the same group that has come up with numerous bin Laden “audio” tapes, seemingly, though tiny and nearly totally unstaffed, whenever it is convenient for Israel to point a finger at someone, magically Site Intelligence, run by former IDF soldier Rita Katz, whose father was executed as a spy by Saddam Hussein, makes another “unbelievable” intelligence find.

    Site Intelligence finds are not only timely for Israel, when the world is focused on claims they have been planning a ‘dirty bomb’ attack to send the US to war against Iran, but always tend to support mysterious organizations [associated with Jewish Adam “Gadahn” Pearlman: 800] run from the caves of the Afghanistan/Pakistan border region.


    After the demise of Iraq, victim of falsified intelligence, now eliminated as an Israeli competitor, all eyes turned to Pakistan, Islam’s only nuclear state.  To establish footholds to destabilize Pakistan, a pro-Indian/Israeli government under President Karzai was installed in Kabul.

    After 9 years, no evidence of any terrorist activity involved in 9/11 has been found in Afghanistan.  The great “net” meant to catch Osama bin Laden and armies of Al Qaeda terrorists came up empty.  Instead, we are told from reliable sources that Arab nations friendly to the US released criminals, transporting them to Afghanistan.

    These “foreign fighters” actually little more than “extras” in a massive global theatre, kept the small US forces engaged for years, all without any purpose other than to establish that a terrorist organization must have been in Afghanistan because there certainly was one after 2002.


    In addition to installing a government that would work directly with Israel and India to organize terrorist attacks on Pakistan, funding to destabilize the oil and gas rich republics of the former Soviet Union had to be raised.

    Opium production under the Taliban had been eliminated.  The new government quickly began a resurgence of opium production and heroin processing.  Aided by agents of the Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad, the governments of Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan quickly fell under the influence of the 65 billion dollar a year Afghanistan drug empire.

    Though the drugs may have been from Afghanistan, multiple intelligence agencies from Israel, India, Turkey and others, aided by military contracting firms contracted to the CIA, carried this plan forward.

    Continual news stories tying Pakistan to failures to suppress terrorism or rumoring involvement in terrorism themselves flowed onto the world scene through western mainstream media, providing a clear footprint of a classic Mossad operation.


    With the demise of Al Qaeda, an unnamed Taliban organization with a website only visible to one person on earth has now declared a mysterious and shadowy war against the United States, in New York City, a city under tight security but one with a very large Israeli/Mossad presence.

    This was the same city where the “dancing Israeli’s,” celebrated 9/11 after filming the attacks.  Their advance knowledge of the attacks has been one of the many puzzle pieces tying Israel to 9/11.

    However, it wasn’t until the “crotch bomber” of last Christmas that the breadth of Israel’s penetration of US security was demonstrated with Abdulmohammed’s attack tying directly to Tel Aviv.

    Anyone who visits New York is aware that security there, especially in Time Square is the highest of anywhere in the world.  The intelligence organizations protecting New York, including the world’s best police force, leave only one organization as capable of this kind of effort, an organization with massive resources in the area, numerous Israeli/American assets and many residual relationships with Gulliani/Kerik/Bush era friends, friends conveniently “asleep at the switch” on 9/11.


    Recent intelligence leaks from several agencies have warned of an impending “9/11 style” attack on a high value target in the US or Europe.  Reports indicated that a conventional bomb enhanced with nuclear material would be used.  Such a weapon would indicate sufficient “WMD” credentials in whipping up the necessary war frenzy to get the American public to overlook the history of falsified intelligence that drove them to war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    However, a quickly thrown together “prank” terror attack taking advantage of the environmental disaster in the gulf and the president’s presence there, when coordinated with the press campaign already in motion attempting to smear the Obama administration with the Katrina failures during the Bush presidency, is just too convenient.

    With Iranian president Ahmadinejad and Secretary of State Clinton both scheduled to be in New York in the next 24 hours, and recent stories out of Israel trying to tie Iran to the Taliban, the issue of “timing” is a critical one.

    The “managed press” aspect of this attack, the phony “web based” confession, the “keeping you safe” scare tactics and the continual drumming of Islamophobia is unmistakable.


    The group blamed in the Site Intelligence/Israeli report, the Pakistani Taliban has been responsible for hundreds of attacks in Pakistan, killing thousands of citizens.  However, reliable sources have tied this group directly to Mossad/RAW training camps inside Afghanistan and Balochistan.  The Pakistani Taliban have long been allies of Israel and India with 2000 terrorist trainers inside Afghanistan arming Pakistani Taliban terrorist group.

    This has been confirmed, not only in direct briefings with the Pakistani ISPR and ISI but US military intelligence sources as well, who dispute the number of terrorist trainers, not their presence.

    Terrorist groups inside Balochistan, the remote Pakistan province said to be a haven for Mossad attacks against Iran, claim to be headquartered in Israel.  These groups work directly with the Pakistan Taliban and are another indication of this current “stunt” turning back on non-Islamic planners.


    With Iran taking the propaganda offensive to the United States, a nation increasingly distancing itself from, not only the idea of supporting an Israeli attack on Iran, but Israel herself.  Israel is under pressure to reestablish itself as America’s partner in a long discredited “war on terror” that has been a huge embarrassment to the US.

    A “very public” attack like his is a message to President Obama.  “We can go where we want and our control of the press will put the blame on anything we do, on you.”

    With over 90% of America’s terror arrests turning out to be innocent bystanders, some tortured for years, untold numbers “disappeared,” Bush era failures have soured public support for hunting terrorist leaders who have increasingly been either captured by Pakistan or have been found to be negotiating with US forces.  The “war on terror” had become an “Israeli franchise,” making billions in increased military aid, some covertly transferred to Israel through “weapons replenishing” and fat military contracts taken from American firms.

    The Marines in Afghanistan are using MRAP vehicles built in Israel, a country with nearly one million guest workers while America has over 30 million unemployed and an unused technology and industrial base better equipped for such production.

    With the signature of this bombing being so close to that of the “crotch bombing,” an attack with Israeli fingerprints from Nigeria to Yemen to Amsterdam, the “superfast” accusation against a Pakistani group was no surprise.


    With New York police discounting the Pakistan connection to the bombing immediately, Fox News has unleashed an attack on the Obama administration in a well orchestrated manner, accusing democrats of “failing to protect the American people.”

    With both Site Intelligence and Fox News tied directly to Israel and the signature and timing of this attack showing clear Israeli fingerprints, Fox may be right.

    America may be unable to protect itself from a nation still seen by most Americans as a close ally.  No other nation has the capability of such an attack or the influence to orchestrate the news, an act already in motion.

    If any finger is pointing anywhere, Fox News is telling us “Israel did it.”